Democrats Propose Rules to Break up Broadband Monopolies

The Democratic party this week released a new party platform — one that proposes new rules that could break up existing broadband monopolies and put an end to often-mindless mergers and consolidation in the telecom space. The proposal was part of a rebranding of the party after its repeated failures in state and federal elections. The proposed rules would also require that regulators look at mergers after they’re completed to see if they served the public interest.

Democrats have been inconsistent on this subject in years’ past.While the Obama administration did block AT&T’s acquisition of T-Mobile (to obvious benefit to consumers), the administration also approved Charter’s $79 billion acquisition of Time Warner Cable and Bright House Networks, which ultimately drove up costs for consumers and resulted in even worse customer service.

There’s also the fact that as the minority party, they likely realize there’s a snowball’s chance in hell of such a platform being implemented anytime soon. Still, Democrats are hoping that a more consumer-centric, anti-monopoly message will resonate with voters that have found their previous election choices from both parties not particularly in tune with their interests.

“Right now our antitrust laws are designed to allow huge corporations to merge, padding the pockets of investors but sending costs skyrocketing for everything from cable bills and airline tickets to food and health care,” US Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer wrote in the New York Times. “We are going to fight to allow regulators to break up big companies if they’re hurting consumers and to make it harder for companies to merge if it reduces competition.”

The outline of the Democrats “Better Deal” proposal is here (pdf), and offers a little more detail. The party singled out AT&T’s looming $89 billion acquisition of Time Warner as an example of how so many of these mergers harm consumers and competition longer term.

“If AT&T succeeds in this deal, it will have more power to restrict the content access of its 135 million wireless and 25.5 million pay-TV subscribers,” the Democrats said. “This will only enable the resulting behemoths to promote their own programming, unfairly discriminate against other distributors and their ability to offer highly desired content, and further restrict small businesses from successfully competing in the market.”

The problem traditionally has been that while both parties talk a good game about innovation and broadband competition, politicians are so awash in AT&T, Comcast, Verizon and Charter campaign contributions, meaningful action magically never materializes. That said, by the time current FCC boss Ajit PAi gets done gutting all oversight of some of the least liked and least competitive companies in American industry, it’s possible the political motivation may finally emerge to actually do something about this traditionally-dysfunctional, M&A-obsessed sector, and the consumer disdain that all-too-often passes for customer service.

Original Source: www.dslreports.com
Facebook Comments

54 Comments

  1. kyrie 3 shoes September 19, 2017 Reply
  2. adidas ultra boost September 19, 2017 Reply
  3. lebron 13 low September 20, 2017 Reply
  4. yeezy boost 350 September 20, 2017 Reply
  5. michael jordan shoes September 21, 2017 Reply
  6. adidas yeezy September 21, 2017 Reply
  7. chrome hearts September 22, 2017 Reply
  8. yeezy boost September 22, 2017 Reply
  9. prada glasses September 22, 2017 Reply
  10. yeezy boost 350 v2 September 23, 2017 Reply
  11. cartier love bracelet September 23, 2017 Reply
  12. nmd uk September 23, 2017 Reply
  13. air max 90 September 24, 2017 Reply
  14. yeezy boost 350 September 24, 2017 Reply
  15. jordan 4 September 25, 2017 Reply
  16. adidas nmd September 25, 2017 Reply
  17. yeezy boost September 26, 2017 Reply
  18. nmd uk September 26, 2017 Reply
  19. pandora charms September 27, 2017 Reply
  20. nmd September 27, 2017 Reply
  21. kobe byrant shoes September 28, 2017 Reply
  22. nmd September 28, 2017 Reply
  23. timberland outlet September 29, 2017 Reply
  24. adidas yeezy September 29, 2017 Reply
  25. hermes belt September 30, 2017 Reply
  26. nmd September 30, 2017 Reply
  27. adidas nmd September 30, 2017 Reply
  28. adidas nmd September 30, 2017 Reply
  29. yeezy October 1, 2017 Reply
  30. yeezy boost October 1, 2017 Reply
  31. adidas stan smith October 2, 2017 Reply
  32. yeezys October 2, 2017 Reply
  33. adidas neo October 3, 2017 Reply
  34. nike air max 2017 October 4, 2017 Reply
  35. chrome hearts October 5, 2017 Reply
  36. adidas ultra boost October 5, 2017 Reply
  37. lacoste online shop October 9, 2017 Reply
  38. yeezy boost 350 v2 October 9, 2017 Reply
  39. van cleef and arpels October 10, 2017 Reply
  40. yeezy shoes October 10, 2017 Reply
  41. adidas stan smith men October 11, 2017 Reply
  42. yeezy boost 350 October 11, 2017 Reply
  43. nike roshe run October 12, 2017 Reply
  44. ultra boost October 12, 2017 Reply
  45. yeezy boost 350 October 12, 2017 Reply
  46. adidas nmd October 13, 2017 Reply
  47. adidas outlet October 15, 2017 Reply
  48. adidas outlet October 15, 2017 Reply
  49. adidas yeezy boost October 16, 2017 Reply
  50. jordan retro 13 October 16, 2017 Reply

Leave a Reply