GOP Effort To Make Environmental Science ‘Transparent’ Worries Scientists

Groups that represent industries from farming to fracking are supporting a legislative push to rewrite how government handles science when drawing up regulations.

And the whole effort has scientists worried.

Consider, for example, the Honest and Open New EPA Science Treatment Act, or HONEST Act, which passed the House in the spring and now is with the Senate. Just how “honest” it is depends on whom you ask.

The HONEST Act says the EPA can’t take a particular action based on scientific research unless that research is “publicly available online in a manner than is sufficient for independent analysis and substantial reproduction of research results.”

Trouble is, making all that data widely available in such detail isn’t always possible — past studies may not have all this documentation. And it’s a huge burden to require that everything from raw data to computer models be made available to outsiders, says Thomas Burke, a professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, who was a science advisor at the EPA.

“To say that every study needs to have the data out there — this is code for ‘We are going challenge it — to raise issues of uncertainty and play the delay game’ that was so successfully played, unfortunately, with things like tobacco,” says Burke.

When industry delays regulation by nitpicking the science, he says, public health suffers.

The HONEST Act has been endorsed by industry groups ranging from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to the American Chemistry Council. Bruce Thompson, president of the American Exploration & Production Council, which represents oil and gas exploration companies, says his group supports the bill because when it comes to issues like fracking, science at the EPA has previously gotten mixed up with politics.

“Hopefully that is changing,” says Thompson. “And I don’t say that from the standpoint of, ‘They’ll politicize it our way.’ That’s not what we want. We want it to be objective and seen in a proper, transparent, scientific light.”

Industries like fracking are important for the economy, Thompson says, so there’s a lot at stake here.

The chairman of the House science committee, Texas Republican Lamar Smith, has described it as a common sense bill that requires the EPA to act on solid, transparent science.

“In our modern information age, federal regulations should be based only upon data that is available for every American to see and that can be subjected to independent review. That’s called the scientific method,” he told his colleagues.

Other legislation being considered by the current Congress, such as the Regulatory Accountability Act, also tries to spell out what kind of science can get used when the government acts.

This legislative effort has the support of groups like the American Farm Bureau Federation, which is concerned about possible restrictions on pesticides.

“More than anything else, we’re looking for a process that’s open, a process where other scientists can kind of look at the data that EPA uses, and then look to see if that science is repeatable,” says Don Parrish, senior director of regulatory relations for the federation.

But words like “repeatable” are exactly what worries Sean Gallagher, the senior government relations officer for the

“Defining terms, or setting in stone, terms like ‘reproducible’ or ‘independent analysis’ may sound good when you read it and it may look simple,” says Gallagher, “but they have serious unintended consequences that may manifest down the line.”

For example, Gallagher points out that research done in the wake of a catastrophe, like the BP oil spill, wouldn’t be repeatable — because no one wants to reproduce an environmental disaster, even if they could. That kind of science could potentially get excluded from decision-making if the HONEST Act became law.

That’s why a number of scientific organizations oppose the bill. “For the scientific community,” Gallagher says, “this is a very bad bill, and it has serious implications.”

President Trump and the Republicans in Congress have made reducing government regulation a top priority, however. That’s why Gallagher thinks some kind of legislation like this bill has a real shot at being taken up by the Senate later this summer.

Original Source : NPR

Facebook Comments


  1. fitflops sale clearance September 19, 2017 Reply
  2. nmd uk September 19, 2017 Reply
  3. adidas yeezy September 20, 2017 Reply
  4. yeezy boost 350 September 20, 2017 Reply
  5. prada glasses September 21, 2017 Reply
  6. nmd September 22, 2017 Reply
  7. yeezy boost 350 v2 September 22, 2017 Reply
  8. nike dunk low September 23, 2017 Reply
  9. adidas yeezy September 23, 2017 Reply
  10. basketball shoes September 24, 2017 Reply
  11. nmd September 24, 2017 Reply
  12. kobe shoes September 25, 2017 Reply
  13. yeezy boost 350 September 25, 2017 Reply
  14. jordan 12 September 26, 2017 Reply
  15. ultra boost 3.0 September 26, 2017 Reply
  16. air jordan September 27, 2017 Reply
  17. yeezy boost 350 v2 September 27, 2017 Reply
  18. cheap nhl jerseys September 28, 2017 Reply
  19. yeezy boost September 28, 2017 Reply
  20. adidas neo online shop September 29, 2017 Reply
  21. yeezy boost September 29, 2017 Reply
  22. yeezy sneakers September 29, 2017 Reply
  23. yeezy shoes September 29, 2017 Reply
  24. yeezy boost 350 October 1, 2017 Reply
  25. kyrie 3 shoes October 1, 2017 Reply
  26. yeezy shoes October 2, 2017 Reply
  27. yeezy boost 350 v2 October 2, 2017 Reply
  28. yeezy boost October 3, 2017 Reply
  29. jordan 6 October 3, 2017 Reply
  30. yeezy boost October 4, 2017 Reply
  31. nike polo October 4, 2017 Reply
  32. yeezy boost October 6, 2017 Reply
  33. michael kors uk October 6, 2017 Reply
  34. yeezy boost October 7, 2017 Reply
  35. michael kors outlet October 7, 2017 Reply
  36. nike huarache October 8, 2017 Reply
  37. adidas nmd October 10, 2017 Reply
  38. curry 4 October 10, 2017 Reply
  39. adidas ultra boost 3.0 October 11, 2017 Reply
  40. led shoes October 11, 2017 Reply
  41. yeezy boost 350 October 11, 2017 Reply
  42. links of london October 11, 2017 Reply
  43. adidas ultra boost October 12, 2017 Reply
  44. ultra boost 3.0 October 12, 2017 Reply
  45. adidas nmd r1 October 13, 2017 Reply
  46. kobe basketball shoes October 13, 2017 Reply
  47. jordan shoes October 14, 2017 Reply
  48. yeezy boost October 15, 2017 Reply
  49. lacoste outlet October 15, 2017 Reply

Leave a Reply